Arbitrator vs Arbiter – What’s the difference?

Arbitration is a legal process in which parties agree to have their dispute resolved by an impartial third party. The arbitrator can be either someone appointed by the two parties or one chosen from a list of professionals in the relevant field.

Arbiter is also a legal term, but it has an unrelated meaning: it means “judge” or “justice.” For example, if you’re on trial for murder and the jury finds you guilty, the judge may sentence you to death by declaring that he will make sure justice is served.

Arbitrator

Arbitration is the process of settling a dispute between two parties, usually in a private setting. An arbitrator is a neutral third party who decides on the outcome of the dispute and makes it binding.

Arbitrators are often used in arbitration clauses to settle business disputes; however, they can also be used to resolve personal conflicts like divorce cases or child custody battles.

Arbiter

Arbiter is a person who makes a decision in a court or other tribunal. An arbitrator is someone who has been given the power to make independent decisions on matters within their jurisdiction, but they do not have the authority to pass judgment on others. For example, if you were involved in an accident and needed someone who could decide how much money should be paid for damages, then an arbitrator would be appropriate for this case because he/she would only be responsible for determining how much compensation was due–not whether or not you were at fault.

The words share an etymology, but are used in different ways.

Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). In arbitration, a neutral third party called an arbitrator or hearing officer listens to both sides of the dispute and makes a decision. Arbitrators may be attorneys or other professionals who have been trained in arbitration law and procedure.

Arbiter comes from the Latin word for judge or ruler. An arbiter is someone who has authority over another person’s actions–for example, an employer might hire an arbiter to settle disputes between employees about their working conditions.

We hope this article has helped you understand the differences between these two terms. The words share an etymology, but are used in different ways. Arbitrator is the more common form today and is used primarily in legal contexts where someone is appointed by parties to hear evidence and make decisions about disputes between them. Arbiter, meanwhile, has fallen out of use and only appears occasionally in literature or poetry as a poetic substitute for “arbitrator.”